16 Jun 2017 14:55:11
I saw someone reply further down about giroud been better than lacazette and I whole heartedly agree. If we are going to part with vast sums for the guy then I think it would be a bigger mistake than not buying a striker full stop. Yes his goal tally looks good but the guy has scored loads of pens. 23 out of his 100 goals in 203 games for Lyon . Not for me.
16 Jun 2017 15:32:53
ye I saw this and realised penos don't count as goals in a game. madness.
16 Jun 2017 15:45:56
That's not the point really. Some peoples pen takers are defenders. If he's the only option then I'd stick I really would. Scoring isn't really a problem for us we have need elsewhere.
16 Jun 2017 17:04:21
Lacazette is not good enough for the Arsenal
Waste of money.
16 Jun 2017 20:33:15
I think he is good enough but for me not as Giroud replacement but as Walcott's. I think we still need to have to big focal point option in our team and we will lose that is we lose Giroud.
17 Jun 2017 08:17:53
Ageuro takes penalties doesn't he? Just imagine how many goals he'd get per season if he actually scored any of them :-)
17 Jun 2017 16:42:44
Welbeck is a better shout than giroud, misses just as many but is more mobile and works harder. He holds the ball better as well. Giroud is a plan b only, we can start with welbeck as well as plan b.